 |
| John Armleder, Cinquième Lune, 2018 |
I really
wanted to like the Judit Reigl works on exhibition at the Musée d’art Moderne
de la Ville de Paris, but was disappointed. I enjoyed the first rooms that
showed the abstract works with their discovery of accidental patterns and the
emergence of glowing colours from the ground of the canvas. But in the second
two rooms are a range of paintings in which Reigl finds male bodies and male
forms in the abstract lines. I found these works disappointing, not only
because of the repetitive focus on male genitals and bodies, but because they looked
like stencils that had been painted over. Then, we are supposed to be surprised
that a male form happens to be emerging?
 |
| John Armleder, Pruniers fleuris, 2018 |
The
exhibition I found more enjoyable today were the new works by Swiss artist John Armleder at
Galerie Almine Rech in the Marais. Even though Armleder’s painting process and
products are very different from Reigl’s, I was fascinated to see the
recurrence of ideas of the aleatory appearance of the unexpected through
playing with paint. The difference being that Armleder—an early Fluxus
practitioner—consciously removes his own subjectivity from the paintings making
the chance appearance of patterns, densities and colours more convincing than
Reigl’s repetition of the male body. Armleder
uses different types of paint, varnish, liquids, glitter, confetti and small
objects; he throws them onto the canvas in a performance-like gesture and the
results are ethereal, unexpected, beautiful and unusual. I also found the interaction
of materials and colours endlessly fascinating– sometimes they merged,
sometimes the oil of one medium didn’t take to that of another, the glitter
spread, little globules exploded and created new colours, often as they hit others
on the canvas. I understood that in this relationship between colours the unexpected
began, rather than that the artist was exploring a particular concept. In
addition, in the relationships of colours we see the overarching idea of
Armleder’s paintings, that of the process of painting being represented on the
canvas.
 |
| John Armleder, Premières oies, 2018 |
I was struck by Armleder’s interest in the natural world. Plants and cacti were
placed around the gallery, creating a kind of living room effect, or at least
reference to the living room. Even on the canvas, there was plenty of evidence
of nature interacting with painting and conversely, the two co-existing but not
interacting. A flip through his books on sale at the gallery confirmed that
this relationship between painting and the natural world is a recurrent concern
of his work.
 |
| John Armleder, Etang, 2018 |
Standing
back from the paintings, it was tempting to see explosions everywhere. The literature
for the exhibition claims the paintings are like volcanoes, presumably spewing out
different coloured paint in a climactic eruption. However, the patterns are
also very aggressive, as different types of paints and colours tear open and
break out of fabric covering the canvas. This makes the works somewhat dark and
apocalyptic when seen from a distance, giving them an anger that forced me as a viewer to stand back. This is exacerbated by the density of paint, materials, canvases, and layers of stuff on the paintings; there is so much going on on the surface that
it’s difficult to know how to approach them, literally. And so we stay back, looking at them as if at a performance. The thick texture also
takes the works into a conversation with the orientation and substance of
painting , and yet, there is nothing sensuous about the works. In turn, I found
this to be further conviction of the complete removal of the artist. In spite
of the juxtaposition with the plants, there was a sense in which the human and
natural elements of Armleder’s paintings have gone long ago. We are left with apocryphal,
doomsday works that are nevertheless filled with the most joyous colours,
sometimes delicate lines, sprinklings of sparkle and confetti.
