Howard Hodgkin, Absent Friends, 2000-2001 |
I imagined many visitors to the Howard Hodgkin exhibition at
the National Portrait Gallery would be bemused by the claim that the works in
display are actually portraits. My favorite piece in the exhibition consisted
of two think brushstrokes in two shades of blue on a wooden support. How, I
wondered, would that be seen as a portrait? Nothing about it resembled a
replication of the human face. But the few people who shared this wonderful
exhibition with me were much more art savvy and sympathetic than I had
anticipated. All of which is to say, this is not a summer blockbuster. The
National Portrait Gallery doesn’t bill it as such, but rather, but it is for
the well-trained art viewer.
Howard Hodgkin, The Tilsons, 1965-67 |
Even though my expectations of the work were not so high, it
still took me some time to get into the paintings. The opening image, Absent Friends (2000-2001)) which gives the
exhibition its title, consisting of a handful of abstract earth colored
brushstrokes, horizontally wavering across the canvas. The painting was
contemplative and generous in its reflection on and memory of lost loved ones.
But then, with the beginning of the exhibition proper we are taken back to
Hodgkin’s early portraits. Like most young painters, the early work is heavily
influenced by what is in his environment: most notably, the traces of German
expressionism and, a little later, the postwar abstraction of Francis Bacon and
Lucien Freud, followed by pop art. As he searches for his own style and visual
language, Hodgkin’s work is not yet compelling.
Howard Hodgkin, Going for a Walk with Andrew, 1995-98 |
When Hodgkin comes into his own around the 1960s, he begins
to do something quite unique in painting. Not only does he lead portraiture
away from the human figure, to the point where in most of the works, the semblance
of a face is nowhere to be found. But perhaps more profoundly, he finds the self
and its identity in color and the variations of his visual language. Dots, lines, long brushstrokes become the expression of emotions,
and atmosphere. The spatial organization of the image, together with the
exciting colors, carry the revelations of identity and character. I don’t know
another abstract painter who does this.
Howard Hodgkin, Waking up in Naples, 1980-84 |
The colors in the substantial middle period (my
categorization) move from psychadelic oranges and blues to muted earth tones. Even
though the paintings are given the title of a person’s name, it doesn’t seem as
though the physical person matters. What matters to Hodgkin is the memory of
the emotions he experienced when he first saw the person. Or, in a painting
titled, Waking up in Naples (1980-84),
I imagine that the oranges and blues might be the world around the figure – the
sea and the brilliant red sun setting on the Mediterranean coast. It could of
course also represent the intensity of emotion that Hodgkin experienced when he
saw the woman in the morning. However, we interpret them, these are not
portraits that give any insight into the sitter. They do of course, reveal much
about the artist and his concerns and preoccupations.
Howard Hodgkin, Souvenirs, 1984 |
One of the most interesting is his ongoing exploration of
the object of painting. Throughout the exhibition, we see his use of the frame
as a canvas for a vision that cannot be easily contained. Alternatively, layers
of paint on Souvenirs, 1984, becomes
a series of curtains or masks over the painting itself. It is as though the
dots are a veil over the painting, hiding and the recoil from revelation to the
world. In this way, painting itself might be said to be the sitter in these
works.
Howard Hodgkin, Blue Portrait, 2011 |
As he gets older, the paint becomes looser, the abstraction
becomes more intense, until the most provocative image: Blue Portrait (2011), a
few broad blue brushstrokes on wood. The painting is said to catch a fleeting
moment in which Selina Fellows appeared at the bar in a blue dress at an
opening of his exhibition at the Centro de Arte Reina Sofia. To me it captures
the abstract, aleatory nature of memory in its often nonsensical play with the
world of reality. The small painting is tender and playful, whimsical and
melancholic, all at the same time. Such complex expression of emotion, together
with bold colors and elusive meaning, make these portraits unique among the
work of his British compatriots in the 20th century.
No comments:
Post a Comment